Composing human body paragraphs

Your body regarding the essay is where you fully build your argument. Each human anatomy paragraph should include one key concept or claim, which can be supported by appropriate examples and proof through the human body of scholarly focus on your topic (i.e. scholastic publications and journal articles).

Together, the human body paragraphs form the inspiration of the argument.

How can I format paragraphs?

The TEEL structure provides an effective means of organising a paragraph. TEEL is short for Topic phrase, Explanation, Evidence, and Link. You might believe my custom essay it is useful to include C for Comment before Link. A paragraph structured this real way would retain the following:

  • Topic sentence – the sentence that is first a human body paragraph that tells your reader exactly what the main concept or claim associated with paragraph will likely to be.
  • Explanation – Explain what you mean in greater detail.
  • Proof – Provide proof to support your concept or claim. For this, relate to your quest. This could add: situation studies, data, documentary evidence, scholastic books or journal articles. Understand that all proof will need appropriate citation.
  • Comment – Consider the skills and limits for the proof and examples which you have actually presented. Explain how your proof supports your claim (in other terms. so how exactly does it ‘prove’ your topic sentence?).
  • Link – Summarise the idea that is main of paragraph, and make clear exactly just how this paragraph supports your current argument.

Example paragraph

One of many hurdles to reaching consensus that is international weather modification action may be the ongoing debate over which nations should shoulder the responsibility. Since the developed world has historically been in charge of nearly all greenhouse fuel emissions, it’s been argued which they should reduce emissions and invite developed nations to prioritise development over ecological concerns (Vinuales, 2011). The idea of ‘common but differentiated duty’ (CBDR) had been formalised within the UN Framework Convention on Climate improvement in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 (UNFCCC, 1992). Article 3.1 explicitly states ‘Accordingly, the developed country Parties should simply take the lead in combating weather modification while the undesirable results thereof’ (p. 4). Nonetheless, because CBDR describes a concept rather than an actionable plan it has remained problematic. As an example, it will not stipulate the level to which, beneath the principle of CBDR, developing countries must certanly be exempt from certain emissions objectives. It has always been a true point of contention in worldwide negotiations on environment change, with developed nations for instance the United States Of America arguing that developed countries needs to do more to cut back emissions (Klein et. al., 2017). Fairness and equity have to be pursued in reaching a international contract on weather modification, but changing this into an actionable strategy is problematic.

Legend: Topic phrase ; Explanation ; Evidence / Example ; Comment ; Link


The paragraph below had been printed in a reaction to the essay question: ‘”Leaders are formulated instead of created.” Would you concur or disagree? Provide grounds for your viewpoint.’

See the paragraph then reply the relevant concern that follows.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *